Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Top Ten Tuesday
It's Top Ten Tuesday from The Broke and the Bookish: http://brokeandbookish.blogspot.com/ The topic is Top Ten Books to Read During Halloween. Here are mine:
1. Harriet's Halloween Candy by Nancy Carlson. Harriet doesn't want to share her Halloween candy with her brother Walt, but will she? There's something extremely satisfying about this family of square dogs.
2. Scratch and Sniff Halloween from the good people at DK. I got mine years ago and it's still sniffy. The apple smell is particularly apple-ish. Why read when you can sniff?
3. The Ghost of Borley Rectory or something by Jane St. Anthony. I don't know the exact title and it's not for sale anywhere, but I kept my light on for three nights after I proofread the bloody thing.
4. Our Way or the Highway by Mary Losure has nothing at all to do with Halloween, but I'm reading it here on October 28th and it's quite good. More on that later.
I didn't quite make it to ten, but thank you for your patience!
Best,
Glyptodon
Friday, October 25, 2013
Short Takes
I've gotten behind
on my blogging this last month, so here are some short reviews:
The first is for
Gimme Shelter! by Mary
Elizabeth Williams. I shoulda known from the title! that the book
wouldn't be as good as I hoped. Gimme Shelter! is
a book about the housing bubble as experienced by one New Yorker with no insights. Ms. Williams mostly takes her husband and two
daughters around to different open houses on weekends. If we're
lucky, the houses and condos she's visiting are comically messy, but
mostly they're just empty like houses are when people sell them.
Occasionally she throws in statistics about skyrocketing real estate prices and future foreclosures, or tells stories about her friends who moved
to Ohio and bought a house for $200,000. Ms. Williams and her
husband can spend $350,000 and they cannot find a two bedroom in New
York for that money. Ms. Williams knows she's in a bubble, but
homeownership is an American need and she has two kids. She and her husband finally buy a
two bedroom co-op unit and she gets an ulcer in the epilogue. Ms.
Williams is a freelance writer in New York, and the reader can tell
that one night she went to just the right party: a man from Simon &
Schuster was there, thinking, "If only I could find someone to
write me a timely book about the housing bubble," and he saw Ms.
Williams across the buffet table and said, "What have you been
up to, Elizabeth?" and she said, "Jeff and I just
bought a house. It's been crazy. I could write a book about it..."
I
consider Pyongyang by
Guy Delisle to be mandatory reading. Burma Chronicles,
was good but not quite as good. It's hard to beat North Korea. Pyongyang
and Shenzhen
are memoirs of Guy Delisle's time as a supervising animator for a
French production company subcontracting to Asia. Both books are
frequently funny stories about trying to get along alone in iffy
places. North Korea being the most bizarre country on Earth, the
book is better. In Burma Chronicles, Mr.
Delisle is easier in his element, which makes a less wacky
travelogue. Burma was a British colony, so the architecture is
familiar and he meets elderly Anglophonic Burmese apologizing for the
country being in such a state, as though he got to Myanmar and its
socks were on the floor and it hadn't dusted. Since his last book,
Mr. Delisle has got married and had a baby named Louis. His wife
works for an NGO, hence the posting to Burma. Louis is more popular
with the Burmese than Mr. Delisle is, and he learns the Burmese for
"Louis' dad" pretty quickly. Between walking around the
neighborhood waving at people who know Louis and spending time
with diplomatic wives and their toddlers, Mr. Delisle has less
material than when he was leaving flowers at the feet of a giant
statue of Kim Il Sung. Mr. Delisle devotes space to the humanitarian
crises in Burma, and he's able to spend some time outside of the
capitol with his wife, looking at Medicens Sans Frontieres
facilities. Mr. Delisle doesn't get a firsthand look at the horrible
oppression that Burmese ethnic minorities are victim to, but he meets
plenty of people who've seen it, and he tells some of their stories.
Burma Chronicles is
certainly worth reading, but read Pyongyang first.
I
finally read Eaters of the Dead by
Michael Crichton. I saw the movie in the theater ages ago and I've
always been intrigued to read it. I was in a peripatetic reading
mood a few weeks ago and I wanted something unputdownable, which I
figured Michael Crichton would be, considering how much Americans
like him. However, this was Ibn Fadn as told by Michael Crichton so
pretty good but it was written in the style of a chronicle: This
happened, then this happened, then this happened, these Vikings are
filthy, then this happened. Ibn Fadn is a scholarly fellow who's
sent on an embassy to the Bulgars but, on the banks of the Volga, he
runs into a group of Vikings and is recruited to be the lucky
thirteenth in a band going north to fight an unspeakable evil. The
wendol, which is like a grendel or, Crichton posits, a Neanderthal,
is raiding an ostentatious settlement and eating people. On the way
up, Ibn Fadn records a bit of Viking ethnography, for realsies. I
ran into his account of a Viking funeral years ago in the most
salient part of an old book called Daily Life of the
Vikings. Free love.
Whether
or not Ibn Fadn and twelve other guys slaughtered the mother wendol
in the sea cave is historically less interesting than the low but
devious fortifications on the great hall and the Vikings' blase attitude
toward death. Herger, the Viking who speaks enough Latin to serve
as Ibn Fadn's explainer, comes out a good character and there's a lot
of randomly chosen description and some adventure spots, but it's all
in cloud of befuddlement that the Vikings don't wash or behave like
the good Muslims do in the City of Peace, the most civilized place in
the world at the time, which is, of course, Baghdad.
Roddy
Doyle's A Greyhound of a Girl
is a forking beautiful book, but it's a 181-page short story. I was
looking forward to it a little too much. The Deportees
killed me, as far as his new
stuff goes, but cor the jaysis dialogue was left behind for A
Greyhound of a Girl. Roddy
Doyle is still good, but who wants to read Standard English
when you can read an Irish brogue? I liked Mary, and Scarlett, and
Emer, and Tansey, but he's getting a little bit too good at describing people. One page of dialogue, and you already know their hopes, dreams, aspirations, and fears. And they were all similar to each other, being a great-grandmother,
grandmother, mother, and daughter.
As
for my contention that AGoaG
is a short story, here is the plot: Mary's grandmother is dying in
hospital, so her dead great-grandmother appears to her and her mother
takes them all to visit the family farm one last time. There are
other things, details, reminiscences, a hatred for greyhounds,
brothers, wide margins, that make up the 181-pages, but I would've
got more out of this if it was called A Greyhound of a Girl
and Other Stories.
Then
there's the first installment of the Saga graphic
novel, Brian K. Vaughn's new opus, which everyone I know read quietly
sometime in the last year. They are all sitting on the edge of their
bottoms now waiting for the second installment to come into work used
so they don't have to buy it for full price.
Quick!
Name the bestselling American author in 1908? Surprise! You have
no idea. You've never even heard about her, and there's nothing
wrong with that. Her pseudonym was Frances Little and the book was
The Lady of Decoration. I
didn't read that, but I read her other book Little Sister
Snow. Japan spent two hundred
years in isolation so that Sunday school teachers wouldn't write
books like this about it. Little Sister Snow
manages a dollop of information on top of a big condescension pie.
It would be easy to underestimate the Japanese army and their
long-range flight capabilities if your first impressions of the
country was a prosaic descriptions of peasants failing at globalism.
Yuki-chan's parents wanted a child more than anything and eventually
got a live one when they were already old and poor because of
Yuki-chan's father's ununderstanding of the new economic order. The book opens with Yuki-chan's favorite sparrow being eaten by a cat.
Yuki-chan chases the cat, intending to drown the motherfucker, when
an American boy in a rickshaw knocks her down in the road, and, Dick Merrit, smiling, his eyes crinkling, with his nice blond hair hanging in a charmingly
carefree way over his forehead, tells her not to drown that poor
puss. Then Yuki-chan grows up to become Yuki-san and receive a
letter from Dick Merrit, the American boy all grown up, asking if he
could stay in Yuki's parents' house for some time, as he is coming
to Japan on business and there are no hotels in the area. After I
was extremely confused, Ms. Little backtracks to explain that the boy
was the son of a teacher at the mission school Yuki-chan attended and
they hadn't just met the once in a chance knocking-over. Adult Dick
stays with Yuki-san and her parents. He is as loveable and charming
as ever an American was and he and Yuki have some jolly times
together. He teaches her English, she teaches him Japanese, they
walk in the garden. There are some ham-fisted conversations where
Dick explains the ever-loving kindness of the Christian God. Yuki
falls in love with Dick, of course, although she's engaged to marry
an officer she's never met. Duty, obedience, filial piety, and Dick's
engagement to a woman offscreen in San Francisco prevent Dick and
Yuki from getting together, but when he leaves, he leaves his diary
behind and Yuki-san starts
her own diary in the broken English that is her inner dialogue: "Ah,
Merrit San, you the one big happy in all my life and I never forget
all your kindful. You give me the good heart, like sun make
flower-bud unclose. You telled me what is soul and purely, and you
say be very good wife." Yuki, despite the American leanings in
her heart, burns her diary and, at the end of the book, is going to
the general's.
Gentle
racism should ruin books for you, and I almost stopped listening to
Little
Sister Snow multiple
times because of the eeeeeegh. But despite the charming pidgin
inanities Yuki speaks in response to Dick's chummy exposition, Yuki
is a good, strong girl character. Frances Little's biggest sin is
presenting her in isolation. Japan was on the ascendant at the time,
and showing a lonely little girl with absolutely no contact except
two elderly parents does not do the country justice. With no community or context, Yuki is an
inconsequential waif waiting to be rescued by an American's smile,
and not a Japanese person living on a dynamic island full of Japanese
people. Yuki must face a non-choice between a gay (you know what I
mean) American and an officer in the service of the Emperor whom her
near-invalid parents have somehow managed to match her with. In the
end, Little
Sister Snow is
not a book about Japan and the Japanese, it's only a book about
American concepts of foreign foreigners (the kind who aren't
European) in the decades before those foreigners started asserting
themselves.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Two Strong Women
Then I read a hiking book
that absolutely nailed it. Wow. The only problem with books this
good is that they end too quickly, and this one is short to begin
with. Halfway to the Sky by
Kimberly Brubaker-Bradley is a hiking book, but I bet people in the
multiple sclerosis community think it's an MS book with a hiking
bent. I keep complaining about books where people go hiking because
they have Problems and Pain and Tragedy and Loss, but Halfway
to the Sky makes it work. (I
may not be complaining about those books in my blog because I always throw
them against the wall after one chapter, Cheryl Strayed.) The
twelve-year-old protagonist Dani, short for Katahdin, is young enough
not to know better than to walk two thousand miles to solve her
problems, while still being smart enough to do her hiking homework.
Dani's brother died and her parents divorced and everything is
horrible and she's twelve, and she's such a damn twelve-year-old in
the book, but she pulls it together. A twelve-year-old can research,
and train, and buy boots. A twelve-year-old can choose a camp stove and forget matches.
Dani
leaves a message for her mom saying that she's going to her dad's
house and gets herself to Springer Mountain, start of the Appalachian Trail.
She's twelve. People give her funny looks. She tells a
seventeen-year-old that her parents gave her permission to hike the
Trail alone, of course she does. He's young enough not to question,
and they hike together until in the shelter on the third night
Dani's mom wakes her up with a flashlight beam in the face and says,
"What the hell do you think you're doing?"
Katahdin
and her deceased brother Springer are products of thru-hiking parents
who met and married on the Trail, but in recent years have become
boring. Dani responds to her mom's, "Why are you hiking the
Trail?" with a, "You hiked it." Dani can
hike the Trail but she's
under-prepared, twelve, and formerly alone. She begs and whines and
invokes her brother's death and acts like a stubborn toad, and her
mother agrees that they can hike on twenty miles to the next town.
They do, mom in tennis shoes and jeans, sleeping in one bag with her
mom's coat thrown over the gap where the zipper can't close. Dani is
unsatisfied in her little twelve-year-old heart, but she also
understands, and her mom reiterates, that she was terrible for
running away in the first place and they can't go farther. At
Suches, Dani's furious dad picks them up and gives Dani a piece of
his mind, though she's entitled to be as angry as she is with him
because he left her mom and has just remarried a now-pregnant woman
she doesn't much care for. And mom says, "I've been thinking."
Mom's
job at the bank allows sabbaticals of up to three months. Mom takes
two; it's asking a lot considering that she already took off stacks
of time for Springer, and for the funeral, but Dani can have two
months. They can go to Catawba but that's it.
Nothing
earth shattering happens on the hike, of course. If it did, we would have a
rescue book, not a hiking book. Dani and her mom mostly keep to
themselves. There's a dearth of over-forties and under-eighteens on
the Trail. Dani and her mom hang around with Vivi, a retired breast cancer
survivor, and Trailhead, who's taking a year off from teaching. They
meet when Dani is hanging the food at a campsite.
"'I'll
have to take your photograph," he said. "I teach high
school English and a self-sufficient adolescent is something of a
miracle to me." He bugged me, and I guess mom could tell.
'Self-sufficiency
is made, not born,' she said."
But
Trailhead sticks to them. When he blows his ACL, Dani helps carry
him down the mountain and knows his loss: he won't make it to
Katahdin and she won't either.
Dani
and her mom get into the trail routine. The "eat some oatmeal,
witness the miracle of God's creation, tape a blister, eat some
peanut butter" of hiking, and then they start having time to
talk about Dani's brother who died that winter. Vivi helps. Sullen
Dani isn't wandering around sharing the tragedy of her life with
strangers but mom is. Vivi says, "I'm having trouble getting a
sense of Springer as a person." Dani resents her mom because she
works too much, because she hasn't been there, because her dad left,
because her brother is dead. There's an insane only-in-America
conversations about health insurance. When Dani and Springer were
younger, mom got a job at the bank just to bring in some extra money
while they were saving up for the house, and the bank had better
insurance so the family switched. Then Springer was diagnosed with
muscular dystrophy. You can't buy insurance for a terminally ill
child, so mom kept working. Dani makes peace, and with Springer not
watching her soccer games. She says, "Why wouldn't you let him
go to my soccer games?" and mom says, "He didn't want to
go. He was embarrassed. He hated it when people stared at him."
When
they meet some local kids camping at a shelter, Dani's flattered that
they're impressed because they're doing a seven hundred mile segment.
They do. They make it. Dani counts herself as one of the AT hiker
drop-outs for now, but she has years. She'll go back. Meanwhile,
her dad's new child is named Harper and she and her take time to breathe. I don't know if I've done justice
to how splendid this book is, but I can't name a truer book about
hiking. Even Bill Bryson's classic
A Walk in the Woods
doesn't pull you into the act of hiking like Halfway to the Sky. Feet,
boots, stoves, water, trees, wind, pack weight, blisters.
Unless
you want to stay home and get married. Amelia Alderson Opie wrote
Adeline Mowbray in
1804, partly inspired by her friend Mary Wollstonecraft's
extra-marital union with a minor radical. The subtitle The
Mother and the Daughter
references Adeline's submission to and rejection by her mother, which
takes up less page space than the scandal but weighs on Adeline's
soul. Mrs. Mowbray is a self-educated woman of no discretion: "For
her, history, biography, poetry, and discoveries in natural
philosophy, had few attractions, while she pored with still
unsatisfied delight over abstruse systems of morals and metaphysics,
or new theories in politics." Her daughter Adeline is early
inducted into the theories of these radical new men, and, taking the
season in Bath, the mother-daughter pair meet one of the authors they
so admire, a Mr. Glenmurray, who at nineteen penned a tract against
marriage which has rumbled him out so that he leads a lonely
existence on the margins of high society while trying to recover from
consumption. Adeline's mother, being socially obnoxious and out of
touch, visits Mr. Glenmurray and allows Adeline to socialize with
him, shocking though it is to the better inhabitants of the town.
They also make the acquaintance of Sir Patrick, a scoundrel, and it
is in this company that Adeline announces that she agrees with Mr.
Glenmurray: Marriage is wrong. A tumult of events follow: Sir
Patrick says dishonorable things, he and Glenmurray duel even though
Glenmurray wrote a tract against dueling, Mrs. Mowbray marries Sir
Patrick, Sir Patrick assaults Adeline, Adeline runs away and into
Glenmurray's arms, Mrs. Mowbray disowns Adeline, and Sir Patrick dies
on a boat. So Adeline and Glenmurray are together, friendless, in a
town by the sea waiting to make the crossing to France, when, walking
in the park, they run into Glenmurray's old school friend and his
wife and sister. The school friend is charmed by Glenmurray's dear
wife, and shocked when Glenmurray writes him a letter explaining
that Adeline is not his wife at all and that they have fled in the night.
This happens again in France and the friend who has met Glenmurray
and Adeline walking together feels so deeply that allowing his
sisters to meet Glenmurray's mistress has besmirched their
honor
that he wants to fight a duel with Glenmurray, but Adeline and
Glenmurray have fled again. Adeline's maidservant quits and can't
find a new position because her old mistress is a mistress. A Quaker
woman agrees to hire the maidservant and tells Adeline about the wages of
sin at the same time. These passages made me take an inventory all
the dishonorable women I know, because speaking or otherwise associating with a dishonorable woman dishonors even the most honorable woman. Fornication, of course, is not
limited to the marital, as it were, act, but includes the suspicion
of such an act, or similar acts, or letting a
certainly-not-a-gentleman-friend sleep over because he respects
boundaries. I know who's been doing that lately. The shame! From now on I can
only talk to fifteen-year-olds, and Laura because she's
married to a girl.
Glenmurray
dies willing to marry Adeline, but Adeline believes in Glenmurray's
principles and won't call his bluff. On his deathbed, he implores
her to marry his cousin Douchemurray and she concedes for his sake. The marriage is
an unhappy one, as husbandface has jerky habits that Glenmurray never
noticed at Thanksgiving. He doesn't respect Adeline and Adeline,
rather than realizing that she was right all along and 1804 marriage
is a ridiculous institution, takes her husband's treatment as
punishment for her former sin. Their daughter is born and he's
disappointed. When business calls him to Jamaica, Adeline realizes
the ideal of a "protector" six months away by sailboat and lets him go. But worsening health and a series of
mix-ups cause Adeline to lie dying penniless in a cottage near the
estate where her mother lives. When the Quaker woman is careening
down the road in a runaway oxcart quite nearby, Mrs. Mowbray grabs
the reigns. Finding that they are concerned with the same wayward
woman, Adeline's mother having long forgiven her, they search for
Adeline and find her in time to watch her die. Because that's what
happens when you break the rules: you die.
Adeline
Mowbray
expands and contracts randomly. Big events happen in tiny
paragraphs, minutes of conversation take pages. Sir Patrick dies
mysteriously on a boat and one assumes he'll be back for a final
sword fight, but he stays gone. Despite that, and the crazy moral
backwardness, Adeline
Mowbray
was a good read. How often does one get any insight into the life of
a free-thinking woman in 1804? The author refused to articulate
Adeline's arguments against marriage, and arguments against marriage
are different nowadays, but Adeline's arguments for marriage at the
end of the book translate to problems of our time. Marriage for
protection and control is a terrible thing and one weeps at the
hardship Adeline went through because she did not succumb to a
half-hour ceremony mandated by the Church of England to happen before
breakfast. A few hundred years before, marriage was contracted
between two individuals and the church had nothing to do with it.
Adeline has legal autonomy as an heiress, but none as a wife.
Because she was one man's life partner, every man she meets thinks
she is sexually available. In that kind of world, one understands
why marriage is mandatory and cursed. For a better analysis of Adeline
Mowbray, please
read the Evening All Afternoon blog
(http://www.eveningallafternoon.com/2010/11/adeline-mowbray.html).
I
have a theory that will blow English literature wide open. Remember
when the Quaker woman was careening down the road in an oxcart and
Mrs. Mowbray caught the reigns? Adeline's only two friends in the
world? What are the chances of that happening? Remember when
Nicholas Nickleby overheard those blokes talking about his sister?
Remember when the Indian gentleman found Sara Crewe next door?
Remember when Darcy and Elizabeth turned up at the same country
house? Remember how quickly Sherlock Holmes solved those crimes?
How likely is any of that to happen in a normal country full of
people? Not very, huh? But, I've figured it out: England only had
five hundred people living there during the nineteenth century. Some
scholars will argue seven hundred, maybe even one thousand, but the
population must have been tiny for coincidences like that to happen
with such regularity. And how else did England manage to colonize
Arabia, Australia, the Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belize, Borneo,
Botswana, British Guiana, Brunei, Canada, Egypt, the Falklands,
Gambia, Ghana, Hong Kong, India, Ireland, Jamaica, Kenya, Kuwait,
Malawi, Malaysia, Malta, Minorca, Namibia, New Zealand, Nigeria,
Palestine, Rhodesia, Samoa, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Africa,
Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and the Virgin Islands and leave that many
people at home? As long as the colonial population was sending money
and letters, they wouldn't be missed. The middle 97% must have gone
abroad, leaving the top one and bottom two percents at home to do the
things that people do in nineteenth century British novels. Am I
right or are Opie, Hodgson Burnett, Conan Doyle, Austen, Dickens and
countless others ineffably lazy authors?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)