I've decided to
start a book blog for two reasons. One is because I read Shakespeare
Wrote for Money by Nick Hornby last year and it was a really keen
idea. Secondly, because I almost never have enough to say about a
single book, or if I do, I forget what it was as I'm writing the
Amazon review and anyway, how much time can one spend creating a well-written Amazon
review? It's Amazon. Sometimes it's Goodreads, but the point
stands. Commenting into the void is not a useful forum for self
expression. (Irony noted.) If there are only two or three reviews up, and if I'm
the first review, woo hoo, then it's fun. But, oh, my opinion on
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is worth less than a single drop
of rain on the ocean. (Goblet of Fire is fantastic, as everyone
knows, except the intentional Harry Potter haters, who do it to stand
out. But I can appreciate a hatred of something universally
acclaimed as long as it's in earnest. Fifty Shades of Grey and
Twilight are two easy targets. I personally dislike the general style of
Impressionism. I busted out laughing at an exihibit of Degas last
year, because it was all thinly veiled naughtiness. Not even thinly
veiled. Or naughty. But really. Really, Mr. Degas. Thirty
sketches of prostitutes looking fancy and then thirty full on cleanly
presented renditions of women getting out of the bath. Women
emerging from the bath. For serious. Rows and rows of paintings of
women bending over as they exited the bath. It was Art and I started
giggling.)
Also, by the way,
I'm boycotting Amazon. I'm not forcing that choice on other people
and I still reference them a million times a day and when I'm bored
at work I read reviews, because we're not meant to surf just anywhere
on the interweb, but Amazon is a professional tool. I
work in at a chain used bookstore. Guess which one. But Amazon
treats its workers badly and they seem be attempting to establish a
monopoly on Shopping, so boo!.
Back to Nick Hornby.
In Shakespeare Wrote for Money (and several other collections of
Nick Hornby's column from Believer magazine, none of which I've read)
Nick Hornby starts with two lists -Books I Bought- and -Books I
Read-. He is selective about which books he lists, there are no more
than five in each column unless he's on a shopping spree. (Authors,
like bookstore employees, get poodles of freebie books, on the off
chance that they will read them and recommend them to the civilians.
So presumably Nick Hornby has books that he neither wants nor cares
about arriving in his mailbox every day, and he only occasionally
mentions them in his column. At the other end of the book-digestive
tract, a used bookstore employee like myself, has a free-flowing tap
of books headed for the mulcher to grab and do with as I will. But
then I end up with piles of middling books all over my house . Then
there are the books that I need to seek out and buy. And the books
that other people recommend or give me. So on recycling day, I end
up staring at books and making mental calculations that I might kinda
wanna read this book in the future maybe, but not enough to pick it up and carry it downstairs to my stash shelf. Books I took home for
free yesterday: The Ultralight Backpacking Book by Ryel Kestenbaum
and the Backpacker magazine More Backcountry Cooking book. By
design, neither of them are the kind of books that you sit down and
read for five hours and feel completed by. More Backcountry Cooking
might be handy. I'm a solo hiker and I need more savory food ideas.
So hopefully the existence of More Backcountry Cooking on my hiking
book shelf will inspire me to borrow my aunt's food dehydrator and
dry some vegetables before May 12th. The Ultralight Backpacking Book
could be read cover to cover, but I probably won't do that because I
feel that ultralight backpacking is an exercise in shopping more than
it is a form of hiking. I was flipping through that book a while
ago, before it didn't sell off the shelf and I nabbed it, and I flipped open at the part where Mr. Kestenbaum says
that he does not take a book when hiking and saves five ounces of
pack-weight that way. He says that after he gave up bringing books
along on a hike, he used to dread the four or five hours between
getting into his campsite and going to bed, but he learned to be
still or be one with nature or something like that and his pack
weighs five ounces less. (He also cuts all the straps off his
pack and saws his toothbrush in half, saving himself another five
ounces. That's an ultralight thing.) I would rather bring a book.
Although I learned this summer that that the book you bring on a solo
hike should not be the cute little Penguin chapbook of Thornstein
Veblen's Conspicous Consumption.
Yesterday when I
grabbed the two hiking books, I did not want to add any more chapter
books to my life because I already have four books going and two on
audio. Thankfully, this morning I finished one. A chilling tale of
Stalinist Russia by Lydia Chukovskaya called Sofia Petrovna. Are
there any tales of Stalinist Russia that aren't chilling? (Besides
the boring Socialist Realist ones that Stalin approved of?) Sofia
Petrovna, the book, is about Sofia Petrovna, the citizen. She's a
metaphor for Soviet society; the author was pretty adamant about that
in the afterword. As a piece of dissident literature, Sofia Petrovna
was carried out of the USSR and into Western Europe in the '60s,
where it was published as The Empty House, and Lydia Chukovskaya
didn't like that one bit. Sofia Petrovna is a metaphor for the
ailments of a society gone mad and not a book about the whole
everyone-was-arrested-and-she-is-all-alone-now thing, evidently. So,
one reading and not the other. Still the afterword was better than
the forward that Graham Greene wrote for The Third Man. I read that
a couple weeks ago and it was full of spoilers. Evidently, Graham
Greene assumed that everyone was so well acquainted with his work
that he could reveal a character's death in the forward and not ruin
the ending. Or maybe he assumed they'd seen the movie first. Graham
Greene wrote The Third Man just to have a book to base the screenplay
off of and my co-worker, whose literary tastes I strongly respect
even though he's rocking a mustache, assures me that The Third Man is
an incredible movie, Orson Welles' lost film, great whodunit, etc. I
read The Third Man because I read Pierre Bayard's fantastic book How
to Talk About Books You Haven't Read quite a while ago, and in that
book he recounts a humorous scene from The Third Man. The
protagonist (whose name I've already forgotten) is mistaken for a
famous author by the Austrian liaison for cultural affairs, who
brings him to an evening of the Austro-British Literary Circle to
discuss the modern novel and answer reader questions. Mr. Protagonist goes
on about his love for Zane Grey , and the Austrian cultural liaison
watches in horror as all the bespectacled readers listen to him describe, the shame!, popular fiction. Turns out this is the
only funny scene in The Third Man and the rest of it is a conspiracy thing.
What's funny all
the time, and I keep laughing really hard, are Jean Webster's books.
My friend Missie said she'd heard that Daddy-Long-Legs was a good
book so I downloaded it off Librivox and listened to it nearly all
the way through while playing Tetris. (I'm hooked on Librivox and
Tetris right now.) In letters, orphan Jerusha Abbott tells about her
college experiences to an anonymous benefactor that she calls
Daddy-Long-Legs, he being anonymous. There's nothing
preposterous, she's a high-spirited young woman with suffragist
leanings, “Oh, I tell you daddy. We we women get our rights, you
men will have to look alive to keep yours.” She knows nothing
about he man but that he is tall, has sent two boys from her
orphanage to college, and on the strength of her comic essay about washing day at the orphanage, he intends to send her to college too.
She tells him stories. She summers on
a farm with an old Methodist couple of his acquaintance, “Some of
the farmers around here have separators, but we don't care for these
new-fashioned ideas.” Letters are long, quick updates, terse,
short, slow, and funny. The sequel, which I'm listening to right
now, is about her Jerusha's roommate taking over the orphanage. You can see the surprise
ending coming a mile off, but it doesn't matter. It would be
disappointing if it didn't end tidily, wouldn't it? Scottish doctor
indeed. As for other books I'm reading: The Kids' Table by Andrea
Seigel, which I put aside because I want to finish The Wicked and The
Just first. The Wicked and The Just by J. Anderson Coates, which I
want to read before I really get into The Kids' Table. I have no
idea where The Wicked and The Just is going. I'm on page
200-something and anything could happen. All I know is that the
oppression of Wales continues. And then I'm reading Flashman by
George McDonald Fraser, which is the most casually misogynistic thing
I've ever read, and less swashbuckling than I thought it would be so
far. And I've got Medieval Europe, Crisis and Renewal from the Great
Courses going in the car. I have an overwhelm-ment of books as
usual. Hence, the blog. Read and enjoy.
hey hey! a blog! wooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeletecan't wait for your commentary!
<3, Ronit
I'm breathless! You're even more verbal and rapid-fire than your mum! Fun. Funny and silverquick.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure I could keep up with you in a book discussion group, but I love your blog! I agree with you about Amazon and I'm now looking up Nick Hornby's Shakespeare Wrote For Money. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteYou are too damn smart for me but I think I could learn a thing or two from you...especially if I have Merriam-webster.com readily available to look up your big words. Go Emily!
ReplyDelete